Transportation 2023 Capital Projects Highlights

Share Transportation 2023 Capital Projects Highlights on Facebook Share Transportation 2023 Capital Projects Highlights on Twitter Share Transportation 2023 Capital Projects Highlights on Linkedin Email Transportation 2023 Capital Projects Highlights link


Thank you for visiting this page. While the question and answer tool is now closed (ran April 6 to May 7, 2023), you are welcome to visit the highlights and learn about capital projects related to Transportation.

Transportation - Capital Projects Highlights 2023

To learn about Engineering and Public Works capital projects, visit the Transportation Capital Projects Highlights page (external link) for interactive maps, images and detailed information about what we are working on this year.

Watch this short video (just over 1 minute) for tips on navigating in the interactive map "Getting Started" video (external link.)

If you have any specific questions about the projects shown on the Engineering and Public Works highlights page, please try our Ask a Question tool below or use the contact information provided in the story map link above.


Thank you for visiting this page. While the question and answer tool is now closed (ran April 6 to May 7, 2023), you are welcome to visit the highlights and learn about capital projects related to Transportation.

Transportation - Capital Projects Highlights 2023

To learn about Engineering and Public Works capital projects, visit the Transportation Capital Projects Highlights page (external link) for interactive maps, images and detailed information about what we are working on this year.

Watch this short video (just over 1 minute) for tips on navigating in the interactive map "Getting Started" video (external link.)

If you have any specific questions about the projects shown on the Engineering and Public Works highlights page, please try our Ask a Question tool below or use the contact information provided in the story map link above.

If you have a specific question related to the projects presented in the Transportation Capital Highlights interactive map, please ask here.

We will respond to your question as soon as possible.

  • Share Will you build a skytrain station near Steveston area? It is a tourist attraction area and it will be more convenient for the tourists to visit. on Facebook Share Will you build a skytrain station near Steveston area? It is a tourist attraction area and it will be more convenient for the tourists to visit. on Twitter Share Will you build a skytrain station near Steveston area? It is a tourist attraction area and it will be more convenient for the tourists to visit. on Linkedin Email Will you build a skytrain station near Steveston area? It is a tourist attraction area and it will be more convenient for the tourists to visit. link

    Will you build a skytrain station near Steveston area? It is a tourist attraction area and it will be more convenient for the tourists to visit.

    Dorothy coats asked 12 months ago

    Thank you for your comment.

    Transit service in the region is planned, developed, and operated by Translink.  According to the Translink Transport 2050 plan, the Canada Line is not envisioned to be extended to the Steveston Area. That being said, alternate means of getting visitors to Steveston from the City Centre are available and will continue to be explored over the coming years through transit improvements and active transportation network expansion.

  • Share What is the city doing to develop a cycling route strategy to address cycle-safe commuter routes between the business centres of Richmond and connecting to downtown Vancouver (Arthur Laing and Canada Line bridges). The end goals should be uninterrupted, safe, well maintained pathways to promote commuting by bicycle, scooter or walking. There does not seem to be a strategy based on my own experience in that there is no such route - either transecting Richmond or north/south to Vancouver. Primary evidence of a poorly communicated/implemented plan is the Steveston Hwy - Railway to #2 proposal. on Facebook Share What is the city doing to develop a cycling route strategy to address cycle-safe commuter routes between the business centres of Richmond and connecting to downtown Vancouver (Arthur Laing and Canada Line bridges). The end goals should be uninterrupted, safe, well maintained pathways to promote commuting by bicycle, scooter or walking. There does not seem to be a strategy based on my own experience in that there is no such route - either transecting Richmond or north/south to Vancouver. Primary evidence of a poorly communicated/implemented plan is the Steveston Hwy - Railway to #2 proposal. on Twitter Share What is the city doing to develop a cycling route strategy to address cycle-safe commuter routes between the business centres of Richmond and connecting to downtown Vancouver (Arthur Laing and Canada Line bridges). The end goals should be uninterrupted, safe, well maintained pathways to promote commuting by bicycle, scooter or walking. There does not seem to be a strategy based on my own experience in that there is no such route - either transecting Richmond or north/south to Vancouver. Primary evidence of a poorly communicated/implemented plan is the Steveston Hwy - Railway to #2 proposal. on Linkedin Email What is the city doing to develop a cycling route strategy to address cycle-safe commuter routes between the business centres of Richmond and connecting to downtown Vancouver (Arthur Laing and Canada Line bridges). The end goals should be uninterrupted, safe, well maintained pathways to promote commuting by bicycle, scooter or walking. There does not seem to be a strategy based on my own experience in that there is no such route - either transecting Richmond or north/south to Vancouver. Primary evidence of a poorly communicated/implemented plan is the Steveston Hwy - Railway to #2 proposal. link

    What is the city doing to develop a cycling route strategy to address cycle-safe commuter routes between the business centres of Richmond and connecting to downtown Vancouver (Arthur Laing and Canada Line bridges). The end goals should be uninterrupted, safe, well maintained pathways to promote commuting by bicycle, scooter or walking. There does not seem to be a strategy based on my own experience in that there is no such route - either transecting Richmond or north/south to Vancouver. Primary evidence of a poorly communicated/implemented plan is the Steveston Hwy - Railway to #2 proposal.

    Mike Bishop asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question.

    An updated cycling network plan was adopted by council last year which included multiple rounds of stakeholder and public consultation leading up to the approval of the plan. The strategy identifies priorities for short, medium and long term cycling network improvements in the city, including regional connections based on the feedback and studies done to enhance the plan.

  • Share Could the City look into the traffic signal optimization along No. 3 Road from Alderbridge to Granville Ave? The traffic signals are not synchronized causing traffic congestion and imposing pedestrian safety hazards, especially at the intersection of Bus Mall and No. 3 Road. It seems the signal efficiency is not working along this section. on Facebook Share Could the City look into the traffic signal optimization along No. 3 Road from Alderbridge to Granville Ave? The traffic signals are not synchronized causing traffic congestion and imposing pedestrian safety hazards, especially at the intersection of Bus Mall and No. 3 Road. It seems the signal efficiency is not working along this section. on Twitter Share Could the City look into the traffic signal optimization along No. 3 Road from Alderbridge to Granville Ave? The traffic signals are not synchronized causing traffic congestion and imposing pedestrian safety hazards, especially at the intersection of Bus Mall and No. 3 Road. It seems the signal efficiency is not working along this section. on Linkedin Email Could the City look into the traffic signal optimization along No. 3 Road from Alderbridge to Granville Ave? The traffic signals are not synchronized causing traffic congestion and imposing pedestrian safety hazards, especially at the intersection of Bus Mall and No. 3 Road. It seems the signal efficiency is not working along this section. link

    Could the City look into the traffic signal optimization along No. 3 Road from Alderbridge to Granville Ave? The traffic signals are not synchronized causing traffic congestion and imposing pedestrian safety hazards, especially at the intersection of Bus Mall and No. 3 Road. It seems the signal efficiency is not working along this section.

    JHYL asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question.

    Overall, while traffic signal coordination can offer benefits in terms of improved traffic flow and efficiency, it also has potential disadvantages such as longer delays for minor street road users, increased vehicle speeds, adversely affect transit vehicles and cyclists and coordination is not as efficient within City Centre intersections where multiple frequent stops are necessary.

    In areas where signal coordination cannot be achieved, such as City Centre, all Richmond signals use fully actuated signal timing.  Through a sophisticated detection system, signals are responsive to vehicle, pedestrian and cyclist demand in all directions of traffic flow.  This optimizes efficiency by either extending a green light to clear a platoon of vehicles, or conversely, reducing wait time for vehicles, pedestrians or cyclists stopped at a red light.

    The traffic signal at No. 3 Road and Brighouse Bus Mall is a very heavily used pedestrian crossing.  Therefore, traffic signal coordination for vehicles on No. 3 Road would not be beneficial to all road users.

  • Share Hello. I am worried about the "Steveston Hwy Multi-Use Pathway - Phase 3". Shared pathways are unsafe for pedestrian and cyclists. Separated/dedicated paths are safer. This information, although counterintuitive, has been provided by BIKEHUB. A better alternative to a shared bike/pedestrian line along this road would be Williams. Less traffic density. In a million years I would ride my bicycle along New Westminster highway on a shared path. Please consider asking for statistics and better practices for providing better alternatives for both pedestrians and cyclists from BIKEHUB before incurring in costly yet unsafe solutions. Pretty please. Thank you. on Facebook Share Hello. I am worried about the "Steveston Hwy Multi-Use Pathway - Phase 3". Shared pathways are unsafe for pedestrian and cyclists. Separated/dedicated paths are safer. This information, although counterintuitive, has been provided by BIKEHUB. A better alternative to a shared bike/pedestrian line along this road would be Williams. Less traffic density. In a million years I would ride my bicycle along New Westminster highway on a shared path. Please consider asking for statistics and better practices for providing better alternatives for both pedestrians and cyclists from BIKEHUB before incurring in costly yet unsafe solutions. Pretty please. Thank you. on Twitter Share Hello. I am worried about the "Steveston Hwy Multi-Use Pathway - Phase 3". Shared pathways are unsafe for pedestrian and cyclists. Separated/dedicated paths are safer. This information, although counterintuitive, has been provided by BIKEHUB. A better alternative to a shared bike/pedestrian line along this road would be Williams. Less traffic density. In a million years I would ride my bicycle along New Westminster highway on a shared path. Please consider asking for statistics and better practices for providing better alternatives for both pedestrians and cyclists from BIKEHUB before incurring in costly yet unsafe solutions. Pretty please. Thank you. on Linkedin Email Hello. I am worried about the "Steveston Hwy Multi-Use Pathway - Phase 3". Shared pathways are unsafe for pedestrian and cyclists. Separated/dedicated paths are safer. This information, although counterintuitive, has been provided by BIKEHUB. A better alternative to a shared bike/pedestrian line along this road would be Williams. Less traffic density. In a million years I would ride my bicycle along New Westminster highway on a shared path. Please consider asking for statistics and better practices for providing better alternatives for both pedestrians and cyclists from BIKEHUB before incurring in costly yet unsafe solutions. Pretty please. Thank you. link

    Hello. I am worried about the "Steveston Hwy Multi-Use Pathway - Phase 3". Shared pathways are unsafe for pedestrian and cyclists. Separated/dedicated paths are safer. This information, although counterintuitive, has been provided by BIKEHUB. A better alternative to a shared bike/pedestrian line along this road would be Williams. Less traffic density. In a million years I would ride my bicycle along New Westminster highway on a shared path. Please consider asking for statistics and better practices for providing better alternatives for both pedestrians and cyclists from BIKEHUB before incurring in costly yet unsafe solutions. Pretty please. Thank you.

    bmartin asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your comments.

    The Steveston Highway Multi-Use Pathway (MUP) Project -Phase 3 is not proposing cyclists and pedestrians share the road with vehicles. The project provides a separated and protected cycling/pedestrian facility from vehicle traffic. The design is in accordance with provincial safety guidelines for such facilities and achieves the ‘AAA’ (comfortable for all ages and all abilities) standard for cycling infrastructure. A cycling facility on Steveston Highway is identified in the City’s Official Community Plan and TransLink’s Regional Bike Network. Although there are bike lanes on Williams Road, the project will expand the cycling network and connect to more commercial, residential and industrial destinations and regionally to the George Massey Tunnel. 

    In terms of the process for the project, Staff assessed the site specific conditions, connectivity to other MUP facilities, available road right-of-way and costs in the selection of a MUP design. This was done in consultation with the public and stakeholders, including HUB Cycling who have endorsed the Steveston Highway Multi-Use Pathway project.

    Multi-use pathways and trails in Richmond comprise approximately 50% of the City’s existing cycling network (170 of 340 lane kilometres).  The data on utility of these facilities does not indicate any safety or operational issues for cyclists and pedestrians. The City collects statistics from our bike counters which indicate multi-use pathways are popular in the community.

  • Share Richmond's solution to any traffic issues seems to be put up another traffic signal. All that does is make vehicles stop more often wasting much more gas and time. We need a traffic management system that allows traffic to flow with less stops. on Facebook Share Richmond's solution to any traffic issues seems to be put up another traffic signal. All that does is make vehicles stop more often wasting much more gas and time. We need a traffic management system that allows traffic to flow with less stops. on Twitter Share Richmond's solution to any traffic issues seems to be put up another traffic signal. All that does is make vehicles stop more often wasting much more gas and time. We need a traffic management system that allows traffic to flow with less stops. on Linkedin Email Richmond's solution to any traffic issues seems to be put up another traffic signal. All that does is make vehicles stop more often wasting much more gas and time. We need a traffic management system that allows traffic to flow with less stops. link

    Richmond's solution to any traffic issues seems to be put up another traffic signal. All that does is make vehicles stop more often wasting much more gas and time. We need a traffic management system that allows traffic to flow with less stops.

    wattis asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your feedback.

    Traffic signals are installed in accordance with established engineering criteria in order to improve the safety and/or efficiency of an intersection and is based on the following considerations: threshold traffic volumes, pedestrian and cyclist crossings, collision history, proximity to other signals, neighbourhood left turn / through egress.

    All Richmond traffic signals are fully actuated, meaning that through a sophisticated detection system, they are responsive to vehicle, pedestrian and cyclist demand.   Within set timing minimums and maximums, all Richmond signals are able to extend or cut short a vehicle green light based on the presence or absence of traffic.  This optimizes efficiency by either extending a green light to clear a platoon of vehicles, or conversely, reducing wait time for vehicles stopped at a red light when there is no cross vehicle traffic or pedestrian walk phase.

    Further signal efficiency in Richmond is achieved through signal coordination along main corridors during peak AM and PM periods. During coordination, the main street green light timing is coordinated with adjacent signals in the predominant direction of traffic flow. This enables vehicles travelling at the speed limit to have a higher likelihood of being able to pass through successive green lights along a corridor during peak periods.


  • Share The construction of left turn lanes at No. 5 road and Cambie has not started yet, it was supposed to be one of the capital projects at least two years ago. Any update on that project? When is the estimated completion date? on Facebook Share The construction of left turn lanes at No. 5 road and Cambie has not started yet, it was supposed to be one of the capital projects at least two years ago. Any update on that project? When is the estimated completion date? on Twitter Share The construction of left turn lanes at No. 5 road and Cambie has not started yet, it was supposed to be one of the capital projects at least two years ago. Any update on that project? When is the estimated completion date? on Linkedin Email The construction of left turn lanes at No. 5 road and Cambie has not started yet, it was supposed to be one of the capital projects at least two years ago. Any update on that project? When is the estimated completion date? link

    The construction of left turn lanes at No. 5 road and Cambie has not started yet, it was supposed to be one of the capital projects at least two years ago. Any update on that project? When is the estimated completion date?

    Gdnnex asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question.  

    Regarding the schedule for the Cambie Road / No. 5 Road intersection improvement project, the detailed design for these works is complete.  However, the addition of the left turn bays and widened sidewalks has resulted in the need to resolve several property issues.  The timeline for resolution of these issues is unknown at this time, but procurement of contractor services for the construction of these works can begin immediately following resolution of these issues. The project is expected to be finished within a year from the start of the procurement process.

  • Share Is there any plan to active No 3 Rd, south of Granville, to have protected and dedicated path for alternative transportation (ie. bike, scooter etc). I believe the city could benefit from trees on boulevards, wider sidewalks with commercial spaces allowed on all arterial road and shorter straight roads. on Facebook Share Is there any plan to active No 3 Rd, south of Granville, to have protected and dedicated path for alternative transportation (ie. bike, scooter etc). I believe the city could benefit from trees on boulevards, wider sidewalks with commercial spaces allowed on all arterial road and shorter straight roads. on Twitter Share Is there any plan to active No 3 Rd, south of Granville, to have protected and dedicated path for alternative transportation (ie. bike, scooter etc). I believe the city could benefit from trees on boulevards, wider sidewalks with commercial spaces allowed on all arterial road and shorter straight roads. on Linkedin Email Is there any plan to active No 3 Rd, south of Granville, to have protected and dedicated path for alternative transportation (ie. bike, scooter etc). I believe the city could benefit from trees on boulevards, wider sidewalks with commercial spaces allowed on all arterial road and shorter straight roads. link

    Is there any plan to active No 3 Rd, south of Granville, to have protected and dedicated path for alternative transportation (ie. bike, scooter etc). I believe the city could benefit from trees on boulevards, wider sidewalks with commercial spaces allowed on all arterial road and shorter straight roads.

    RyanLee asked about 1 year ago

    Thank you for your question and comment. 

    The updated cycling network plan approved last year has envisioned a number of short, medium, and long term arterials to be improved. South of Granville Ave on No. 3 Road will be enhanced when development along the arterial occurs. Other midtown crossings are identified in the plan to connect the north-south corridors in the City.